Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 5, 2014
Article Number A11
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2013008
Published online 10 February 2014
  1. AISC. 1970. Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings, Manual of Steel Construction, 7th edn. Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Steel Construction. [Google Scholar]
  2. AISC. 1978. Manual of Steel Construction, 8th edn. Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Steel Construction. [Google Scholar]
  3. AISC. 1986. Manual of Steel Construction – Load and Resistance Factor Design, 8th edn. Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Steel Construction. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson KE, Chong KP. 1986. Least cost computer-aided design of steel girders. Engineering Journal. AISC, Fourth Quarter, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  5. Basturk B, Karaboga D. 2006. An Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) Algorithm for Numeric Function Optimization, IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, May 12–14, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. [Google Scholar]
  6. Belegundu AD. 1982. A study of mathematical programming methods for structural optimization, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatti MA. 1996. Optimum cost design of partially composite steel beams using LRFD. Engineering Journal. AISC, First Quarter. p. 18–29. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coello CAC, Montes EM. 2002. Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16, 193–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coello CAC. 2000. Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Computers in Industry, 41, 113–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deb K. 1991. Optimal design of a welded beam via genetic algorithms. AIAA Journal, 29(11), 2013–2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Det Norske Veritas (DNV). 1995. Buckling strength analysis, Classification Notes No. 30.1. Ed. Det Norske Veritas, Hovik, Norway. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong Y, Tang J, Xu B, Wang D. 2005. An application of swarm optimization to nonlinear programming. Computer and Mathematics with Applications, 49, 1655–1668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Douty R. 1980. Design of steel connections by math programming. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 106(ST5), 1135–1154. [Google Scholar]
  14. Farkas J, Jarmai K. 2008. Minimum cost design of a square box column composed from orthogonally stiffened welded steel plates, International conference proceedings on design fabrication and economy of welded structures, Hungary. p. 70–71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Farkas J. 1991. Fabrication aspects in the optimum design of welded structures. Structural Optimization, 3(1), 51–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Farkas J, Jarmai K. 1994. Minimum cost design of laterally loaded welded rectangular cellular plates. Structural Optimization, 8(4), 262–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farkas J, Jarmai K, Snyman J. 2009. Global minimum cost design of a welded square stiffened plate supported at four corners, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 40, 477–489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Farkas J. 2002. Thickness design of axially compressed unstiffened cylindrical shells with circumferential welds. Welding in the World, 46, 26–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hojjat A, Kamal C. 2006. Cost Optimization of Structures, Fuzzy Logic, Genetic Algorithms and Parallel Computing. John Wiley: UK. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarmai K. 2007. Single- and multiobjective optimization of a welded stringer-stiffened cylindrical shell. Periodica Polytechnica, 51(2), 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jarmai K, Snyman JA, Farkas J. 2006. Minimum cost design of a welded orthogonally stiffened cylindrical shell. Computers and Structures, 84, 787–797. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karaboga D. 2005. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Technical Report-TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department. [Google Scholar]
  23. Karaboga D, Basturk B. 2007. Artificial bee colony (abc) optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems, in IFSA 2007, LNAI 4529, Melin P et al., Editors. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 789–798. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karaboga D, Basturk B. 2008. On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 8, 687–697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lorenz RF. 1988. Understanding composite beam design methods using LRFD. Engineering Journal. AISC, First Quarter. p. 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Luis MCS, Farkas J, Jarmai K. 2008. Optimization of an orthogonally stiffened plate considering fatigue constraints, International conference proceedings on design fabrication and economy of welded structures, Hungary. p. 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  27. Marcin C, Farkas J, Andrej G, Jarmai K, Katarzyna R. 2008. Optimization of steel beams and columns for variable rib configuration, International conference proceedings on design fabrication and economy of welded structures, Hungary. p. 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  28. Montes EM, Coello CAC. 2005. Useful Infeasible Solutions in Engineering Optimization with Evolutionary Algorithms. LNAI, 3789, 652–662. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qie H, Ling W. 2007. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20, 89–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ragsdell KM, Phillips DT. 1976. Optimal design of a class of welded structures using geometric programming. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industries, 98(3), 1021–1025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ray T, Liew K. 2003. Society and civilization: an optimization algorithm based on the simulation of social behavior. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7, 386–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sandgren E. 1988. Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechanical design, Proceedings of the ASME Design Technology Conference, Kissimine, FL. p. 95–105. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.