Issue 
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 8, 2017



Article Number  A6  
Number of page(s)  4  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2016017  
Published online  23 January 2017 
Research Article
Area efficient digital logic NOT gate using single electron box (SEB)
Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
^{*} email: bahrepour@ieee.org
Received:
30
October
2016
Accepted:
2
December
2016
The continuing scaling down of complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) has led researchers to build new devices with nano dimensions, whose behavior will be interpreted based on quantum mechanics. Singleelectron devices (SEDs) are promising candidates for future VLSI applications, due to their ultra small dimensions and lower power consumption. In most SED based digital logic designs, a single gate is introduced and its performance discussed. While in the SED based circuits the fan out of designed gate circuit should be considered and measured. In the other words, cascaded SED based designs must work properly so that the next stage(s) should be driven by the previous stage. In this paper, previously NOT gate based on single electron box (SEB) which is an important structure in SED technology, is reviewed in order to obtain correct operation in series connections. The correct operation of the NOT gate is investigated in a buffer circuit which uses two connected NOT gate in series. Then, for achieving better performance the designed buffer circuit is improved by the use of scaling process.
Key words: Digital logic NOT gate / Singleelectron devices (SEDs) / Fan out / Switching speed / Bit error rate / Single electron box (SEB)
© D. Bahrepour, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Continuous improvement in CMOS technology sizes into a nanometer range results in many limitations due to more subthreshold leakage, gate oxide leakage, and performance. The singleelectron devices are among the most promising future devices for its low power dissipation and high density and are attractive candidate for postCMOS electronics [1–4].
Tunneling of an electron through an insulator is possible in quantum mechanics. An electron tunnels through the insulator if the distance between the conductors is small enough [5–9]. The theory of single electron phenomena shows that the charging energy is:(1)where C is the capacitance of the island. When the island size becomes comparable with the de Broglie wavelength of the electrons inside the island, their energy quantization becomes substantial [8].
In this case, the energy scale of the charging effects is given by a more general notion, the electron addition energy E _{a}. Most of the time, E _{a} may be well approximated by equation (2).(2)which E _{k} is the quantum kinetic energy of the added electron; for a degenerate electron gas E _{k} = 1/g(εF)V, where V is the island volume and g(εF) is the density of states on the Fermi surface [8].
Although SED utilized in many digital logic gates [10–16], the gate characteristics are usually limited to single gate operation and not operation in complicated designs. Some of the most used SEDs are the single electron box (SEB) and the single electron transistor (SET). Figure 1a shows a SEB that operates as a digital logic NOT gate [16] and Figure 1b demonstrates its operation. As shown, SEB consists of a single tunnel junction C _{t} and one “normal” (non tunneling) capacitor C _{b}. Between the tunnel junction and normal capacitor, an island is created. It accepts one input, V _{i}, and produces one output, V _{o}. Figure 2a illustrates connecting two introduced NOT gate in order to achieve a buffer circuit as an application for a NOT gate. In many cases designers propose a circuit and evaluate them by simulation software. While after introducing a digital application for a SED based circuit design optimization is the next challenge [17]. In the following section, the previously proposed SEB based NOT gate is optimized.
Figure 1.
(a) A single electron box which is also a simple NOT gate. (b) Applied input and resulted output displayed in black and red colors respectively. 
Figure 2.
(a) Cascading two NOT gate circuits based on a SEB in order to obtain a buffer gate. (b) Gate level design of a buffer using two cascaded NOT gate. 
In order to have a valid comparison between the performances of two different designs, the first important factor is that the two designs must be implemented in the same technology. In other words, comparison of two designs, which are implemented in two different technologies, is not valid unless the two designs are scaled into a single technology. Therefore, we need an index for SED technology. Index technology enables designers to present different designs in the same technology.
2 Optimizing digital logic NOT gate
This paper aims to optimize the previously introduced SEB based NOT gate (Figure 1a). It is noteworthy that two different designs should be implemented in the same technology in order to achieve a valid comparison. In the other words, comparison of two SEB designs, which are implemented in two different technologies, is not valid unless the two circuits are scaled into a single technology. Therefore, we need an index for SED technology [17].
Any technology index must be based on real technological limitations and it has also a direct relation with the performance of the circuits. One of the wellknown technology indices is the minimum feature size for MOSFET technology. This index demonstrates the most important limitations of the technology in an appropriate manner due the fact that it has a clear relation with MOSFET circuit performances. For SED based circuits and regarding the two technology index specifications [17], the total capacitor of the island, C _{T}, and the tunneling resistor, R _{T}, are introduced as a technology index. C _{T} includes the possibility of miniaturization and R _{T} defines the technology’s manufacturing tolerance. Scaling process is a method for achieving better performance in SED based circuits. This method changes the voltage, resistance and capacitance values and leads to better switching speed. However, it does not change the logic function. As mentioned for achieving better performance, NOT gate circuit design is improved by the use of scaling process [17]. The scaling process needs two main parameters named scaling factors. The scaling factors are:(3) (4)where CSF is the capacitance scaling factor, C _{T,new} is the total capacitor in the new technology, C _{T,old} is the total capacitor in the old technology, RSF is the tunneling resistance factor, R _{T,new} is the tunneling resistance in the new technology, and R _{T,old} is the tunneling resistance in the old technology.
For a logic circuit design consists of more than one island or tunnel junction, the total capacitance for each island and the tunneling resistance for each tunnel junction should be considered, and then the smallest total capacitance and the smallest tunneling resistance should be selected as the technology of that design.
Here, the mentioned NOT gate (Figure 1) is scaled regard to achieving better performance. As reported in the original paper [16] the total capacitor in the original (old) technology, C _{T}, and the tunneling resistance in the original (old) technology, R _{T}, for the NOT gate is 400 aF, and 100 KΩ, respectively. In following, for the new design, C _{T} and R _{T} are set to 40 aF and 10 KΩ, respectively. Hence, from equations (3) and (4) both the CSF and RSF are equal to 0.1.
Now by determining the CSF and RSF values for scaling capacitors and the tunneling resistors are multiplied by CSF and RSF, respectively, and the voltages are divided by CSF. As mentioned using scaling process does not change the logic function. utilizing scaling process lead to better performance for a NOT gate and using two NOT gates in buffer design result in an optimized buffer design.
Figures 3 demonstrates simulation results for original and scaled buffer designs. The bias voltage (V _{b}) is adjusted to 20 mV and 200 mV for original and scaled design, respectively. Also, the tunneling resistance for both designs is adjusted to 100 KΩ. It shows that the tunneling resistance does not change the logic. Table 1 shows the other simulation parameters used in the simulation process.
Figure 3.
Original SEB buffer design (a) applied input and (b) resulted output. (c) Applied input for the scaled SEB buffer design (d) resulted output. 
Capacitance values utilized for simulation.
In this paper, we scaled the capacitors 10 times smaller and the voltage 10 times larger in comparison with the original design. Smaller capacitors lead to the smaller area in the fabrication process and voltage for the area is traded.
3 Conclusion
In this paper, a previously introduced SEB based NOT gate is used to design a buffer gate. It shows that the NOT gate can operate in a concatenated circuit correctly. The main issue for comparing two different circuits is scaling in the same technology. The technology index for SEB based circuit is the total capacitor of the island. Then by introducing the capacitance scaling factor, CSF, and the resistance scaling factor, RSF, the NOT gate and also the buffer circuit is scaled in order to achieve better performance. In the scaling process, the logic function remains unchanged while switching speed obtain. Simulations carried out in commonly used simulators in nanoelectronics, SIMON, validate the correct working of these digital functions.
4 Implication and influences
The published work has an impact in providing and introducing a technology index in SED based circuits. This index helps designers to design their circuits and compare them correctly. in this paper by using technology index and scaling process a high performance digital logic NOT gate is proposed based on SEB, however, it can be used in more complex gate circuits such as AND, OR, and XOR.
References
 Iwamura H, Akazawa M, Amemiya Y. 1998. Single electron majority logic circuits. IEICE Trans. Electron., E81C(1), 42–46. [Google Scholar]
 Dasigenis MM, Karafyllidis I, Thanailakis A. 2001. A singleelectron XOR gate. Microelectron. J., 32, 117–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ono TY, Fujiwara A, Inokawa H. 2000. Silicon singleelectron devices for logic applications, in Proceedings of the 30th IEEE International Symposium on MultipleValued Logic (ISMVL 2000), Portland, OR, USA. p. 411–420. [Google Scholar]
 Takahashi Y, Ono Y, Fujiwara A, Inokawa H. 2000. Multigate singleelectron transistors and their application to an exclusiveOR gate. Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 637–639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Oya T, Asai T, Fukui T, Amemiya Y. 2003. A majority logic device using an irreversible singleelectron box. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 2(2), 15–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rehan SE. 2007. A novel halfadder using single electron tunneling technology, in Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, Bangkok, Thailand. p. 245–249. [Google Scholar]
 Zardalidis GT, Karafyllidis I. 2002. A single electron halfadder. Microelectron. J., 33, 265–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Likharev KK. 1999. Singleelectron devices and their applications. Proceeding IEEE, 87(4), 606–632. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Tucker JR. 1992. Complementary digital logic based on the “Coulomb blockade”. J. Appl. Phys., 72(9), 4399–4413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Soheili N, Bahrepour D, Loloeyan P, Navi K. 2009. A novel fiveinput configurable cell based on irreversible single electron box. Contemporary Engineering Sciences (CES), 2(4), 149–163. [Google Scholar]
 Wang C. 2015. Silicon nanowires for single slectron transistor fabrication, PhD thesis, Imperial College London. https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/27058. [Google Scholar]
 Ono Y, Inokawa H, Takahashi Y, Nishiguchi K, Fujiwara A. 2010. Single‐electron transistor and its logic application. Nanotechnology, 4, 45–68. [Google Scholar]
 Bahrepour D, Sharifi MJ. 2010. A new single electron tunneling cell based on linear threshold gate, in Enabling Science and Nanotechnology (ESciNano), 2010 International Conference on, Kuala Lumpur. p. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
 Bahrepour D, Sharifi MJ. 2013. A novel high speed full adder based on linear threshold gate and its application to a 4–2 compressor. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 38(11), 3041–3050. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Bahrepour D, Sharifi MJ. 2013. High speed full adder based on modified linear threshold gate and its application to a 4–2 compressor. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci., 10(11), 2527–2535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rehan SE. 2011. The design of logic gates using Single Electron Box (SEB) nanodevices, in Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS), 2011 6th International Conference on, Athens, Greece. p. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
 Sharifi MJ, Bahrepour D. 2011. Introducing a technology index concept and optimum performance design procedure for singleelectrondevice based circuits. Microelectron. J., 42(7), 942–949. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Wasshuber C, Kosina H, Selberherr S. 1997. SIMON – a simulator for singleelectron tunnel devices and circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst., 16, 937–944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Bahrepour D: Area efficient digital logic NOT gate using single electron box (SEB). Int. J. Simul. Multisci. Des. Optim., 2017, 8, A6.
All Tables
All Figures
Figure 1.
(a) A single electron box which is also a simple NOT gate. (b) Applied input and resulted output displayed in black and red colors respectively. 

In the text 
Figure 2.
(a) Cascading two NOT gate circuits based on a SEB in order to obtain a buffer gate. (b) Gate level design of a buffer using two cascaded NOT gate. 

In the text 
Figure 3.
Original SEB buffer design (a) applied input and (b) resulted output. (c) Applied input for the scaled SEB buffer design (d) resulted output. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.