Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 17, 2026
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2025035
Published online 11 June 2026
  1. Q.N. Van, T.N. Van, D.H. Tien, Investigating the influential factors of ejective time and compressible force magnitude to fluid jet movement, Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim. 12, 1–3 (2021). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Ramesh, A.S. Praveen, P.B. Pillai, Numerical simulation of heat sinks with different configurations for high power LED thermal management, Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim. 13, 18 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. Q. Li, C. Liu, Molecular dynamics simulation of heat transfer with effects of fluid-lattice interactions, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 55, 8088–8092 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. Q. Jiasheng, F.A. Gilmar, Z. Xuehua, Surface nanodroplets: formation, dissolution, and applications, Langmuir, 35, 39, 12583–12596 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Jia, B.Y. Jae, Z. Xuehua, Viscosity-mediated growth and coalescence of surface nanodroplets, J. Phys. Chem. C, 124, 23, 12476–12484 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Suphanat, Y.M. A. Elisa, Y. Jingjie, Y.N. Teng, Many-body dissipative particle dynamics simulations of nanodroplet formation in 3D nano-inkjet printing, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 27, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. T.T. Fu, Y.N. Wu, Y.G. Ma, Droplet formation and breakup dynamics in microfluidic flow-focusing devices: From dripping to jetting, Chem. Eng. Sci. 84, 207–217 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. Q.N. Van, S.P. Xuan, W.L. Jau, Separation criteria of nanoscale water droplets from a nozzle plate surface, MATEC Web Conf. 169, 01016 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. N.S.R. Krishnan, S.P. Uppu, A novel approach for noise prediction using Neural network trained with an efficient optimization technique, Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim. 14, 3 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  10. H.H. Bao, C.L. Bin, B.L. Yao, Molecular dynamics simulations of the nano-droplet impact process on hydrophobic surfaces, Chin. Phys. B. 23, 074702 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Chen et al., Statistical validation methods for nanoscale simulations, Comput. Mater. Sci. 190, 110307 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. Q.N. Van, W.L. Jau, Investigation of temperature effects on nanoscale water droplet separation onto a fixed solid plate, Simul.: Trans. Soc. Model. Simul. Int. 1-9 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Dalili, S. Chandra, J. Mostaghimi, Formation of liquid sheets by deposition of droplets on a surface, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 418, 292–299 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T.T.B. Ngo, V.T. Nguyen, T.H. Fang, Nanoscale friction behavior and deformation during copper chemical mechanical polishing process, J. Mol. Model. 29, 293 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Liu et al., Advanced optimization methods in MD-based fluid simulations, J. Nanofluids, 12, 1162–1171 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Zhang et al., Optimized MD simulation of nanoscale jet formation, Nano Lett. 19, 8901–8908 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. V.Q. Nguyen, J.W. Lin, V.D. Pham, Studying the influences of temperature to the liquid ejection and nanodroplet formation, Int. J. Nanosci. 19, 06 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Jia, B.Y. Jae, Z. Xuehua, Viscosity-mediated growth and coalescence of surface nanodroplets, J. Phys. Chem. C, 124, 23, 12476–12484 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Kim, H. Lee, Equilibrium analysis of molecular dynamics in confined systems, J. Mol. Liquids, 314, 113588 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. S.S. Masatsugu, Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function (Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton, 2012), pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Hugo, Standard Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution: definition and Properties, ForsChem Res. 2, 1–16 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.