EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 8 (2017) Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim., 8 (2017) A5 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 8, 2017
Article Number A5
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2016013
Published online 09 February 2017
  1. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O. 2003. Topology optimization: theory, method and applications. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N. 1988. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 71(2), 197–224. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sigmund O, Maute K. 2013. Topology optimization approaches. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 48(6), 1031–1055. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Deaton JD, Grandhi RV. 2013. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 49(1), 1–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo X, Cheng GD. 2010. Recent development in structural design and optimization. Acta Mech. Sin., 26(6), 807–823. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhu JH, Li Y, Zhang WH, Hou J. 2016. Shape preserving design with structural topology optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 53(4), 893–906. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-015-1364-3. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang WH, Zhu JH. 2006. A new finite-circle family method for optimal multi-component packing design. WCCM VII: Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhu JH, Zhang WH. 2010. Integrated layout design of supports and structures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 199(9), 557–569. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.10.011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Beckers P. 2009. Integrated layout design of multi-component system. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 78(6), 631–651. DOI: 10.1002/nme.2499. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhu JH, Gao HH, Zhang WH, Zhou Y. 2014. A multi-point constraints based integrated layout and topology optimization design of multi-component systems. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 51(2), 397–407. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-014-1134-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Xia L. 2016. Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-015-9151-2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Remouchamps A, Bruyneel M, Fleury C, Grihon S. 2011. Application of a bi-level scheme including topology optimization to the design of an aircraft pylon. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 44(6), 739–750. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vladimir B, Raphael H. 1994. Topology optimization or transport wing internal structure. 5th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurt M, Melike N, Charbel F. 2002. Conceptual layout of aeroelastic wing structures by topology optimization. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lars K, Alastair T, Martin K, Richard B. 2004. Topology optimisation of aircraft wing box ribs. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qiu FS, Ying P, Cong S, Liu ST. 2010. Topology optimization design of 3D wing box. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. Syst., 16(11), 2405–2409. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang W. 2007. A new evolutionary structural optimization method and its application in the wing structure topology optimization. Aircraft Design. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schramm U, Zhou M. 2006. Recent developments in the commercial implementation of topology optimization, in IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials: Status and Perspectives. Bendsøe MP, Olhoff N, Sigmund O, Editors. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht. p. 239–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wei W, Zhao MY. 2008. Integrate topology/shape/size optimization into high aspect-ratio wing design. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 30, 596–600. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bendsøe MP. 1989. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct. Optim., 1, 193–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN. 1991. The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometry and generalized shape optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 89, 197–224. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mlejnek HP. 1992. Some aspects of the genesis of structures. Struct. Optim., 5, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fletcher R. 1980. Practical methods of optimization 1. Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, p71–94. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vasiliev OV. 1996. Optimization methods. World Federation Pub Inc. [Google Scholar]
  25. Svanberg K. 1995. A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch. Proceedings of the first world congress of Struct Multidiscip Optim. Goslar, Germany, 28, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Radovcic Y, Remouchamps A. 2002. BOSS QUATTRO: an open system for parametric design. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 23(2), 140–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.