Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 3, Number 2, April 2009
Page(s) 342 - 346
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijsmdo/2009009
Published online 24 June 2009
  1. R.L. Congalton, R. Oderwald, R.A. Mead, Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 167-1678 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  2. X.L. Dai, S. Khorram, Remotely sensed change detection based on artificial neural networks, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1187-1194 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  3. G.M. Foody, On the compensation for chance agreement in image classification accuracy assessment, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1459-1460 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  4. G.M. Foody, Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 185-201 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Fritz, L. See, Comparison of land cover maps using fuzzy agreement, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 787-807 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Hagen-Zanker, B. Straatman, I. Uljee, Further developments of a fuzzy set map comparison approach, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 769-785 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Ma, R.H. Redmond, Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 435-439 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  8. J.F. Mas, Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 139-152 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  9. R.G. Pontius, Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 275-293 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Power, A. Simms, R. White, Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 77-100 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  11. G.H. Rosenfield, Fitzpatrick-Lins Coefficient of agreement as a measure of Thematic Classification accuracy, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 131-137 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Singh, Digital change detection using remote-sensing data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 989–1003 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Taylor, Quantitative Methods in Geography Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, (1977). [Google Scholar]
  14. G.M. Wickware, P.J. Howarth, Procedures for change detection using Landsat digital data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 277-291 (1981). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.