EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 8 (2017) Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim., 8 (2017) A10 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 8, 2017
Article Number A10
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2017003
Published online 30 June 2017
  1. Pfender E. 1987. Fundamental studies associated with plasma spray process, in Thermal spray: advances in coatings technology. 14, Houck DL, Editor. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fauchais P, Vardelle M. 1994. Plasma spraying: Present and future. Pure. Appl. Chem., 66, 1247–1258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moreau C, Gougeon P, Lamontagne M, Lacasse V, Vaudreuil G, Cielo P. 1994. On-line control of the plasma spraying process by monitoring the temperature, velocity and trajectory of in-flight particles, in Thermal spray industrial applications. Berndt CC et al., Editors. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 431–437. [Google Scholar]
  4. Refke A, Barbezat G, Loch M. 2001. The benefit of an on-line diagnostic system for the optimisation of plasma spray devices and parameters, in Thermal spray 2001: new surfaces for a new millennium, Singapore. Berndt CC et al., Editors. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 765–770. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vaidya A, Bancke G, Sampath S, Herman H. 2001. Influence of process variables on the plasma sprayed coatings: an integrated study, in Thermal spray 2001: new surfaces for a new millennium, Singapore. Berndt CC et al., Editors. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 1345–1349. [Google Scholar]
  6. Döring JE, Vassen R, Stöver D. 2002. The influence of spray parameters on particle properties, in Proc. of International Thermal Spray Conference and Exposition. Lugscheider E et al., Editors. DVS-Verlag GmbH: Düsseldorf. p. 440–445. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lugscheider E, Papenfuβ-Janzen N. 2002. Simulation of the influence of spray parameters on particle properties in APS, in Proceedings of International Thermal Spray Conference and Exposition. Lugscheider E et al., Editors. DVS-Verlag GmbH: Düsseldorf. p. 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Prystay M, Gougeon P, Moreau C. 2001. Structure of plasma sprayed zircona coatings tailored by controlling the temperature and velocity of the sprayed particles, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 10, 67–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Friis M, Persson C, Wigren J. 2001. Influence of particle in-flight characteristics on the microstructure of atmospheric plasma sprayed yttria stabilized ZrO2. Surf. Coat. Technol., 141, 115–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guessasma S, Montavon G, Coddet C. 2004. Modeling of the APS plasma spray process using artificial neural networks: basis, requirements and an example. Comput. Mater. Sci., 29, 315–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bassir D, Guessasma S, Boubakar L. 2009. Hybrid computational strategy based on ANN and GAPS: application for identification of a non-linear model of composite material. Compos. Struct., 88(2), 262–270 [Google Scholar]
  12. Guessasma S, Bassir D. 2010. Optimization of the mechanical properties of virtual porous solids using a hybrid approach. Acta Mater., 58, 716–725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guessasma S, Bassir D. 2010. Identification of mechanical properties of biopolymer composites sensitive to interface effect using hybrid approach. Mech. Mater, 42(3), 344–353. [Google Scholar]
  14. Grihon S, Krog L, Bassir D. 2009. Numerical optimization applied to structure sizing at AIRBUS: a multi-step process. Int. J. Simul. Multi. Design Optim., 3, 432–442. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guessasma S, Bassir D. 2009. Comparing heuristic and deterministic approaches to optimise mechanical parameters of biopolymer composite materials. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct, 16, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guessasma S, Montavon G, Coddet C. 2003. Neural Networks, design of experiments and other optimizations methodologies to quantify parameter dependence of atmospheric plasma spraying, in Thermal spray 2003: advancing the science and applying the technology. Marple BR et al., Editors. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 939–948. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ananthapadmanabhan PV, Thiyagarajan TK, Sreekumar KP, Satpute RU, Venkatramani N, Ramachandran K. 2003. Co-spraying of alumina-titania: correlation of coating composition and properties with particle behaviour in the plasma jet. Surf. Coat. Technol., 168, 231–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gell M, Jordan EH, Sohn YH, Goberman D, Shaw L, Xiao TD. 2001. Development and implementation of plasma sprayed nanostructured ceramic coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol., 146, 48–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nylén P, Wigren J, Idetjärn J, Pejryd L. 2001. On-line Microstructure and property control of thermal sprayed abrasive coatings, in Thermal spray 2001: new surfaces for a new millennium Singapore. Berndt CC et al., Editors. ASM International: Materials Park, OH. p. 1213–1220. [Google Scholar]
  20. Galvão Novaes C, Almeida Bezerra M, Galvão Paranhos da Silva E, Pinto dos Santos AM, da Silva Romão IL, Santos Neto JH. 2016. A review of multivariate designs applied to the optimization of methods based on inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). Microchem. J., 128, 331–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin CM, Yen SH, Su CY. 2016. Measurement and optimization of atmospheric plasma sprayed CoMoCrSi coatings parameters on Ti-6Al-4 V substrates affecting microstructural and properties using hybrid abductor induction mechanism. Measurement, 94, 157–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.