Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 3 / No 2 (April 2009) Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim., 3 2 (2009) 332-336 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 3, Number 2, April 2009
Page(s) 332 - 336
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijsmdo/2009007
Published online 24 June 2009
  1. R. Fathallah, H. Sidhom, C. Braham, L. Castex, Effect of surface properties on high cycle fatigue behaviour of shot peened ductile steel, Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 1050-1056, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Gentil, M. Desvignes, L. Castex, Shot peened surface analysis: cracks, roughness and residual stresses, Mater. Technol. 75, 493-497 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Desvignes, Influence du grenaillage de précontrainte sur la tenue en service de l'acier 35CD4, Thèse ENSAM, (1987). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Ahmed, Etude de la creation des fissures en surface de lacier 35CD4lors du grenaillage de precontrainte, memoire de DEA mecanique appliquee a la construction. ENSAM, Paris (1987) [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Wagner, Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 263, 210-216 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Sidhom, A. Laamouri, R. Fathallah, C. Braham, H.P. Lieurade, Fatigue strength improvement of 5083 H11 Al-alloy T-welded joints by shot peening: experimental cha-racterization and predictive approach, Int. J. Fatigue, 27, 729-745 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Kyriacou, Shot Peening Mechanics: A Theoretical Study, 6th ed., ICSP, 505-516 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  8. S.A. Meguid, Mechanics of shot peening, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, UK (1975). [Google Scholar]
  9. Y.F. Al-Obaid, A rudimentary analysis of improving fatigue life of metals by shot peening, J. Appl. Mech. 57, 307-312 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Guechichi, L. Castex, J. Frelat, G. Inglebert, Predicting residual stresses due to shot peening, In: A. Meguid, Editor, Impact Surface Treatment, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 11-22 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Zarka, J. Casier, Mechanics Today, Pergamon Press, Nemat-Nasser, 6 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  12. M.T. Khabou, L. Castex, G. Inglebert, Effect of material behaviour law on the theoretical shot peening results, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 9, 537-549 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Fathallah, G. Inglebert, L. Castex, Prediction of plastic deformation and residual stresses induced by shot peening in metallic parts, Mater. Sci. Technol. 14, 631-639 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y.F. Al-Obaid, Shot peening mechanics: experimental and theoretical analysis. Mech. Mater. 19, 251-260 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Kobayashi, T. Matsui, Y. Murakami, Mechanics of creation of compressive residual stress by shot peening, Int. J. Fatigue, 20, 351-357 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S.T.S. Al-Hassani, Mechanical aspects of residual stress development in shot Peening In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shot Peening, 583-602 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Wohlfahrt, The influence of peening conditions on the resulting distribution of residual stress, In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot peening, Chicago, USA, 316-331 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Kyriacou, Shot peening mechanics, a theorical study, In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Shot Peening, ICSP6, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Hardy, C.N. Baronet, G.V. Tordion, The elasto-plastic indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere, Int. J. Nu-mer Methods Eng. 3, 451-462 (1971). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Edberg, L. Lindgren, K. Mori, Shot peening simulated by two different finite element formulations, In: Shen S, Dawson E, editors.Simulation of materials processing: theory, methods and applications-NUMIFORM95, 425-430 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  21. S.T.S. Al-Hassani, K. Kormi, D.C. Webb, Numerical simulation of multiple shot impact, In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on shot peening, Warsaw, Poland, 217-227 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Guagliano, Relating Almen intensity to residual stresses induced by shot peening: a numerical approach, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 110, 277-286 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. K.Schiffner, C.D. Helling, Simulation of residual stresses by shot peening, Comput. Struct. 72, 329-340 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Baragetti, Three-dimensional finite element procedures for shot peening residual stress field prediction, Int. J. Comput Appl. Technol., 14, 51-63 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Deslaef, E. Rouhaud, S. Rasouli-Yazdi, 3D finite ele-ment models of shot peening processes, Mat. Sci. Forum, 347-349, 241-246 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Rouhaud, D. Deslaef, Influence of shots' material on shot peening, a finite element model, Mat. Sci. Forum 404-407, 153-158 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Frija, T. Hassine, R. Fathallah, C. Bouraoui, A. Dogui, Finite element modelling of shot peening process: Prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plas-tic deformations and the surface integrity, Mater. Sci. Technol. A 426(1-2), 173-180 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, Finite element modelling of shot peening residual stresses, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 92-93, 401-404 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Levers, A. Prior, Finite element analysis of shot peening, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 80-81, 304-308 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Meo, R. Vignjevic, Finite element analysis of residual stress induced by shot peening process, Adv. Engin. Soft. 34(9), 569-575 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. G.H. Majzoobi, R. Azizi, N.A. Alavi, A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 164-165, 1226-1234 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Hong, J.Y. Ooi, B. Shaw, A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses, Eng. Failure Anal. 15(8), 1097-1110 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Johnson, Impact Strength of Materials, Arnold, London, (1972). [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Clausen, Ermittlung von Einflussgressen beim Kugel-strahlen durch Einzelkornversuche In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shot Peening, 279-285 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  35. K. Iida, Dent and affected layer produced by shot peening, Second International Conference on Shot Peening, Chicago, USA, 217-227 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Edberg, L. Lindgren, K. Mori, Shot peening simulated by two different finite element formulations In: Shen, Dawson (Eds.), Simulation of Materials Processing: Theory, Methods and Applications, Balkema, Rotterdam, 425-430 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  37. . S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, J. Daly, Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residuals tresses, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 31, 179-191 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model, Int. J. Impact Eng. 27, 119-134 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Han, D. Peric, A.J.L. Crook, D.R.J. Owen, A combined finite/discrete element simulation of shot peening processes. Part I: Studies on 2D interaction laws, Eng. Comput., 17, 593-619 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Han, D. Peric, D.R.J. Owen, J. Yu, A combined finite/discrete element simulation of shot peening processes. Part II: 3D interaction laws, Eng. Comput. 17, 680-702 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. K. Han, D.R.J. Owen, D. Peric, Combined finite/discrete element and explicit/implicit simulation of peen forming process, Eng. Comput. 19, 92-118 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Shen, Assessment, Development and Validation of Computational Fracture Mechanics Methodologies and Tools for Shotpeened Materials Used in Rotorcraft Principal Structural Elements [S.I.], (2004). [Google Scholar]
  43. I. Lillamand, Cyclic modelling of the mechanical state produced by shotpeening, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 24, 93-104 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Guechichi,, L. Castex, Fatigue limits prediction of surface treated materials, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 172, 381-387 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. A.S. Franchim, C.V. De, D.N. Travessa, M.N. De, Analytical modelling for residual stresses produced by shot peening, Mater. Des., (In Press) Accepted Manuscript. (2008). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.