Open Access
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 3, Number 2, April 2009
Page(s) 332 - 336
Published online 24 June 2009
  1. R. Fathallah, H. Sidhom, C. Braham, L. Castex, Effect of surface properties on high cycle fatigue behaviour of shot peened ductile steel, Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 1050-1056, (2003). [CrossRef]
  2. B. Gentil, M. Desvignes, L. Castex, Shot peened surface analysis: cracks, roughness and residual stresses, Mater. Technol. 75, 493-497 (1987).
  3. M. Desvignes, Influence du grenaillage de précontrainte sur la tenue en service de l'acier 35CD4, Thèse ENSAM, (1987).
  4. R. Ahmed, Etude de la creation des fissures en surface de lacier 35CD4lors du grenaillage de precontrainte, memoire de DEA mecanique appliquee a la construction. ENSAM, Paris (1987)
  5. L. Wagner, Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 263, 210-216 (1999)
  6. N. Sidhom, A. Laamouri, R. Fathallah, C. Braham, H.P. Lieurade, Fatigue strength improvement of 5083 H11 Al-alloy T-welded joints by shot peening: experimental cha-racterization and predictive approach, Int. J. Fatigue, 27, 729-745 (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. S. Kyriacou, Shot Peening Mechanics: A Theoretical Study, 6th ed., ICSP, 505-516 (1996).
  8. S.A. Meguid, Mechanics of shot peening, Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, UK (1975).
  9. Y.F. Al-Obaid, A rudimentary analysis of improving fatigue life of metals by shot peening, J. Appl. Mech. 57, 307-312 (1990). [CrossRef]
  10. H. Guechichi, L. Castex, J. Frelat, G. Inglebert, Predicting residual stresses due to shot peening, In: A. Meguid, Editor, Impact Surface Treatment, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 11-22 (1986).
  11. J. Zarka, J. Casier, Mechanics Today, Pergamon Press, Nemat-Nasser, 6 (1979).
  12. M.T. Khabou, L. Castex, G. Inglebert, Effect of material behaviour law on the theoretical shot peening results, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 9, 537-549 (1989).
  13. R. Fathallah, G. Inglebert, L. Castex, Prediction of plastic deformation and residual stresses induced by shot peening in metallic parts, Mater. Sci. Technol. 14, 631-639 (1998). [CrossRef]
  14. Y.F. Al-Obaid, Shot peening mechanics: experimental and theoretical analysis. Mech. Mater. 19, 251-260 (1995). [CrossRef]
  15. M. Kobayashi, T. Matsui, Y. Murakami, Mechanics of creation of compressive residual stress by shot peening, Int. J. Fatigue, 20, 351-357 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. S.T.S. Al-Hassani, Mechanical aspects of residual stress development in shot Peening In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shot Peening, 583-602 (1981).
  17. H. Wohlfahrt, The influence of peening conditions on the resulting distribution of residual stress, In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shot peening, Chicago, USA, 316-331 (1984).
  18. S. Kyriacou, Shot peening mechanics, a theorical study, In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Shot Peening, ICSP6, (1996).
  19. C. Hardy, C.N. Baronet, G.V. Tordion, The elasto-plastic indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere, Int. J. Nu-mer Methods Eng. 3, 451-462 (1971). [CrossRef]
  20. J. Edberg, L. Lindgren, K. Mori, Shot peening simulated by two different finite element formulations, In: Shen S, Dawson E, editors.Simulation of materials processing: theory, methods and applications-NUMIFORM95, 425-430 (1995).
  21. S.T.S. Al-Hassani, K. Kormi, D.C. Webb, Numerical simulation of multiple shot impact, In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on shot peening, Warsaw, Poland, 217-227 (1999).
  22. M. Guagliano, Relating Almen intensity to residual stresses induced by shot peening: a numerical approach, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 110, 277-286 (2001). [CrossRef]
  23. K.Schiffner, C.D. Helling, Simulation of residual stresses by shot peening, Comput. Struct. 72, 329-340 (1999). [CrossRef]
  24. S. Baragetti, Three-dimensional finite element procedures for shot peening residual stress field prediction, Int. J. Comput Appl. Technol., 14, 51-63 (2001). [CrossRef]
  25. D. Deslaef, E. Rouhaud, S. Rasouli-Yazdi, 3D finite ele-ment models of shot peening processes, Mat. Sci. Forum, 347-349, 241-246 (2000). [CrossRef]
  26. E. Rouhaud, D. Deslaef, Influence of shots' material on shot peening, a finite element model, Mat. Sci. Forum 404-407, 153-158 (2002). [CrossRef]
  27. M. Frija, T. Hassine, R. Fathallah, C. Bouraoui, A. Dogui, Finite element modelling of shot peening process: Prediction of the compressive residual stresses, the plas-tic deformations and the surface integrity, Mater. Sci. Technol. A 426(1-2), 173-180 (2006). [CrossRef]
  28. S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, Finite element modelling of shot peening residual stresses, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 92-93, 401-404 (1999). [CrossRef]
  29. A. Levers, A. Prior, Finite element analysis of shot peening, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 80-81, 304-308 (1998). [CrossRef]
  30. M. Meo, R. Vignjevic, Finite element analysis of residual stress induced by shot peening process, Adv. Engin. Soft. 34(9), 569-575 (2003). [CrossRef]
  31. G.H. Majzoobi, R. Azizi, N.A. Alavi, A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 164-165, 1226-1234 (2005). [CrossRef]
  32. T. Hong, J.Y. Ooi, B. Shaw, A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses, Eng. Failure Anal. 15(8), 1097-1110 (2008). [CrossRef]
  33. W. Johnson, Impact Strength of Materials, Arnold, London, (1972).
  34. R. Clausen, Ermittlung von Einflussgressen beim Kugel-strahlen durch Einzelkornversuche In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shot Peening, 279-285 (1981).
  35. K. Iida, Dent and affected layer produced by shot peening, Second International Conference on Shot Peening, Chicago, USA, 217-227 (1984).
  36. J. Edberg, L. Lindgren, K. Mori, Shot peening simulated by two different finite element formulations In: Shen, Dawson (Eds.), Simulation of Materials Processing: Theory, Methods and Applications, Balkema, Rotterdam, 425-430 (1995).
  37. . S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, J. Daly, Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residuals tresses, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 31, 179-191 (1999). [CrossRef]
  38. S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model, Int. J. Impact Eng. 27, 119-134 (2002). [CrossRef]
  39. K. Han, D. Peric, A.J.L. Crook, D.R.J. Owen, A combined finite/discrete element simulation of shot peening processes. Part I: Studies on 2D interaction laws, Eng. Comput., 17, 593-619 (2000). [CrossRef]
  40. K. Han, D. Peric, D.R.J. Owen, J. Yu, A combined finite/discrete element simulation of shot peening processes. Part II: 3D interaction laws, Eng. Comput. 17, 680-702 (2000). [CrossRef]
  41. K. Han, D.R.J. Owen, D. Peric, Combined finite/discrete element and explicit/implicit simulation of peen forming process, Eng. Comput. 19, 92-118 (2002). [CrossRef]
  42. S. Shen, Assessment, Development and Validation of Computational Fracture Mechanics Methodologies and Tools for Shotpeened Materials Used in Rotorcraft Principal Structural Elements [S.I.], (2004).
  43. I. Lillamand, Cyclic modelling of the mechanical state produced by shotpeening, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 24, 93-104 (2001). [CrossRef]
  44. H. Guechichi,, L. Castex, Fatigue limits prediction of surface treated materials, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 172, 381-387 (2006). [CrossRef]
  45. A.S. Franchim, C.V. De, D.N. Travessa, M.N. De, Analytical modelling for residual stresses produced by shot peening, Mater. Des., (In Press) Accepted Manuscript. (2008).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.