EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 1 / No 1 (October 2007) Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim., 1 1 (2007) 19-29 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 1, Number 1, October 2007
Page(s) 19 - 29
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijsmdo:2007003
Published online 12 December 2007
  1. G.I. Schueller, Computational stochastic mechanics – recent advances, Comp. & Struct. 79, 2225–2234 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K.-H. Lee, G.-J. Park, Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput. Struct. 79, 77–86 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Messac, A. Ismail-Yahaya, Multiobjective robust design using physical programming. Struct. Multidiscip. O. 23, 357–371 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hans-Georg Beyer, Bernhard Sendhoff, Robust optimization – A comprehensive survey. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 196, 3190–3218 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Papadrakakis, N.D. Lagaros, Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 191, 3491–3507 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Qu, R.T. Haftka, S. Venkataraman, Deterministic and Reliability-Based Optimization of Composite Laminates for Cryogenic Environments. AIAA Journal 41, 2029–2036 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Allen, K. Maute, Reliability-based shape optimization of structures undergoing fluid-structure interaction phenomena. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194 (30-33), 3472–3495 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.S. Kong, D.M. Frangopol, Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering - ASCE 129, 818–828 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eurocode 3, Design of steel structures, Part1.1: General rules for buildings, CEN, ENV 1993-1-1/1992 [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Pareto, Cours d'économique politique, Vol. 1&2, Rouge, Lausanne (1896) [Google Scholar]
  11. R.T. Marler, J.S. Arora, Survey of Multi-objective Optimization Methods for Engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26, 369–395 (2004) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. C.A. Coello Coello, An Updated Survey of GA-Based Multi-objective Optimization Techniques. ACM Computing Surveys 32, 109–143 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. N.D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, G. Kokossalakis, Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Comput. Struct. 80, 571–587 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Papadrakakis, Y. Tsompanakis, N.D. Lagaros, Structural shape optimization using Evolution Strategies. Eng. Optimiz. 31, 515–540 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N.D. Lagaros, V. Plevris, M. Papadrakakis, Multi-objective design optimization using cascade evolutionary computations. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194, 3496–3515 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.N. Patnaik, R.M. Coroneos, J.D. Guptill, D.A. Hopkins, Comparative evaluation of different optimization algorithms for structural design applications. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 39, 1761–1774 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D.C. Charmpis, N.D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, Multi-database exploration of large design spaces in the framework of cascade evolutionary structural sizing optimization. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 194 (30-33) 3315–3330 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, W.J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics 21, 239–245 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  20. Eurocode 1 : Basis of design and actions on structures – Part 2-4: Actions on Structures – Wind actions, CEN, ENV 1991-2-4, May 1995 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.