EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 11 (2020) Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim., 11 (2020) 26 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Simul. Multidisci. Des. Optim.
Volume 11, 2020
Article Number 26
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2020020
Published online 16 December 2020
  1. R. Czyba, M. Lemanowicz, Z. Gorol, T. Kudala, Construction Prototyping, Flight Dynamics Modeling, and Aerodynamic Analysis of Hybrid VTOL Unmanned Aircraft, J. Adv. Transp. 2018 , 1–15 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. De Wagter et al., Design, control, and visual navigation of the DelftaCopter VTOL tail-sitter UAV, Journal of Field Robotics 35, 937–960 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Panagiotou, P. Kaparos, C. Salpingidou, K. Yakinthos, Aerodynamic design of a MALE UAV, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 50 , 127–138 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Hassanalian, A. Abdelkefi, Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: a review, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 91 , 99–131 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A.S. Saeed, A.B. Younes, C. Cai, G. Cai, A survey of hybrid Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 98 , 91–105 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Marques, A. Maligno, S. Dierks, A. Bachouche, Flight dynamics principles of canard aircraft: implications for UAV configuration decision, Int. J. Unmanned Syst. Eng. 1 , 12–30 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. X.D. Li Zhonghua, H. Tian, Flight dynamics characteristics and current situation of canard aircraft, Jiangsu Sci. Technol. Inf. 8, 60–61 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Muchowski, M. Szumski, A. Krzysiak, Aerodynamic concept of the UAV in the gyrodyne configuration, Trans. Aerosp. Res. 2018 , 49–66 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Homainejad, C. Rizos, Application of multiple categories of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in different airspaces for bushfire monitoring and response, in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 2015, pp. 55–60 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Guessasma, D. Bassir, Optimization of the mechanical properties of virtual porous solids using a hybrid approach, Acta Mater. 58 , 716–725 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Guessasma, D.H. Bassir, Identification of mechanical properties of biopolymer composites sensitive to interface effect using hybrid approach, Mech. Mater. 42 , 343–353 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Kaganski, J. Majak, K. Karjust, S. Toompalu, Implementation of key performance indicators selection model as part of the enterprise analysis model, Proc. CIRP 63 , 283–288 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Eiskop, A. Snatkin, K. Karjust, E. Tungel, Production monitoring system design and implementation, Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. 67 , 10–16 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. F.X. Irisarri, D.H. Bassir, N. Carrere, J. F. Maire, Multiobjective stacking sequence optimization for laminated composite structures, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69 , 983–990 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Wei, Y. Liu, Z. Li, A multi-discretization scheme for topology optimization based on the parameterized level set method, Int. J. Simul. Multidiscip. Des. Optim. 11 , 1–10 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Fang, Z. He, Analysis of response surface designs to outlier, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Business and E-Government , ICEE 2010, pp. 2648– 2651 [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Hamdani, B. Radi, A. El Hami, Optimization of solder joints in embedded mechatronic systems via Kriging-assisted CMA-ES algorithm, Int. J. Simul. Multidiscip. Des. Optim. 10 , 1–16 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R.O. Bahebshi, A.T. Almaktoom, Heuristic dynamic approach to perishable products in presence of deterioration effect, Int. J. Simul. Multidiscip. Des. Optim. 10 , 1–12 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Majak, M. Pohlak, Optimal material orientation of linear and non-linear elastic 3D anisotropic materials, Meccanica 45 , 671–680 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. X. Tang, D.H. Bassir, W. Zhang, Shape, sizing optimization and material selection based on mixed variables and genetic algorithm, Optim. Eng. 12 , 111–128 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Majak, S. Hannus, Orientational design of anisotropic materials using the hill and Tsai–Wu strength criteria, Mech. Compos. Mater. 39 , 509–520 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. Zhang, Z. He, Z. Liu, A comparative study of three central composite designs in response surface methodology, J. Shenyang Inst. Aeronaut. Eng. 24 , 87–91 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. S.H. Munson-Mcgee, D- and G-optimal experimental designs for the partition coefficient in freeze concentration, J. Food Eng. 121 , 80–86 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Prasad, S. Choi, Variable-fidelity aerodynamic analysis of lift fan type aircraft, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 71 , 636–650 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.