Table 6

Experts’ judgment for alternatives’ relative importance level.

Criteria Locations\Experts E1 E2 E3 E4 E5
C1 H1 G VG M M M
H2 VG G G G VVG
H3 M MG VVG MB G
H4 MG M MG VVG MB
H5 MB VG MB VG G
H6 G MG B G MB
H1 M M MB MB G
H2 MG VG VG G MG
C2 H3 VG VVG G G G
H4 G B M MB B
H5 MB G B M VVG
H6 VG G MB VVG VG
H1 G VG VVG G G
H2 MG M M MG M
C3 H3 M B MB B M
H4 VG M G VG G
H5 VVG G G G VVG
C4 H6 G M M MB M
H1 G VG VG VG VG
H2 VG MG G MB G
H3 VG M VVG G MB
H4 MG MB MB MB G
H5 M G G MB M
H6 G VVG M VVG M
H1 MB VVG M G VVG
H2 M B VG G G
C5 H3 MB M VVG G VG
H4 MG G VVG MB G
H5 G G G MB MB
H6 VVG M G G G
H1 B VG B MG M
H2 G VVG MG G B
C6 H3 MB MB MB MB G
H4 G MB G MB MB
H5 G G G M G
H6 MB MB MB VG G

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.