Open Access
Table 1
Benchmarking table for recent researches on the Savonius turbine.
References | Blades type | Method and analysis | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|
This work | Partially deformable blades | Numerical analysis (CFD) | A remarkable improvement in torque coefficient with 32%. |
Dominicus et al. [17] | Slotted Blades | Experimental investigation | The turbine with a 10% overlap ratio showed the best performance with an improvement of 28% in power coefficient. |
Fatahian et al. [18] | Blades with deflector | Numerical analysis (CFD) | By adding a deflector, the power coefficient enhanced dramatically up to 24.2%. |
Kaya et al. [19] | Elliptical blades | Numerical analysis (CFD) | The elliptical design model produced a maximum power coefficient that was over 30 greater than the based one. |
Priyadumkol et al. [20] | Modified Blade | Experimental investigation | A higher power coefficient compared to the conventional rotor by 6.67% and 18.75% for a Reynolds number of 136640 and 156160, respectively. |
Manganhar et al. [21] | Blades with Guiding rotor house | Numerical analysis (CFD) | The implementation of GRH led to an enhancement in the rotor’s power coefficient of roughly 27% |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.