Open Access
期号
Int. J. Simul. Multisci. Des. Optim.
卷号 5, 2014
文献编号 A25
页数 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2014005
网上发表时间 2014年12月24日
  1. Integration of tools and processes for affordable vehicles, Tech. Report RTO-TR-AVT-093 AC/323(AVT-093)TP/102, NATO Research and Technology Organisation, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pre-Milestone A and Early-Phase Systems Engineering: A Retrospective Review and Benefits for Future Air Force Acquisition, Committee on Pre-Milestone A and Early-Phase Systems Engineering: A Retrospective Review and Benefits for Future Air Force Acquisition, National Research Council, ISBN: 0-309-11476-4, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fantini P, Balachandran LK, Guenov MD. 2008. Computational system for multi disciplinary optimization at conceptual design stage. International Journal of Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 2, 177–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schumacher G, Daoud F, Petersson O, Wagner M. 2012. Multidisciplinary airframe design optimization, 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kolonay RM, Sobolewski M. 2011. Service ORiented Computing EnviRonment (SORCER) for large scale, distributed, dynamic fidelity aeroelastic analysis & optimization, International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  6. Alyanak E, Kolonay R. 2012. Efficient supersonic air vehicle structural modeling for conceptual design, 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSM, Indianapolis, DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-5519 [Google Scholar]
  7. Neill D, Herendeen D. 1995. ASTROS Enhancements: Volume I – Astros User’s Manual, Wright Laboratory WL-TR-96-3004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mason WH. 2002. Software for Aerodynamics and Aircraft Design. Retrieved 2012, from Skin Friction/Form Factor Drag estimation: http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason_f/MRsoft.html#SkinFriction [Google Scholar]
  9. Melin T. 2000. A Vortex Lattice MATLAB Implementation for Linear Aerodynamic Wing Applications, Royal Institute of Technology, http://www.redhammer.se/tornado [Google Scholar]
  10. Macinnis DV. 1994. A Simplified Cycle-Matching Transient Simulation of a Turbofan Engine, AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, Indianapolis. [Google Scholar]
  11. Newmarch J. 2006. Foundations of Jini 2 Programming, Apress, Inc., Chap. 1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Freeman E, Hupfer S, Arnold K. 1999. JavaSpaces Principles, Patterns, and Practice, Addison Wesley Longman Inc., Chap. 1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Argod V, Belegundu AD, Aziz A, Agrawala V, Jain R, Rajan SD. 2008. MPI-enabled shape optimization of panels subjected to air blast loading. International Journal of Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 2, 273–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raymer D. 1992. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 2nd ed., AIAA Education Series, Chap. 18. [Google Scholar]
  15. Reklaitis GV, Ravindran A, Ragsdell KM. 1983. Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, Chap. 8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Burton SA, Prakash C, Machnaim J. 2007. Multistage Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil Shape Optimization using the C3 Process, 3rd AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialist Conference, Honolulu. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.